# Definitional Power - Synthesis A By:: [[Ross Jackson]] 2025-10-15 Tension exists at the confluence of people, power, and words. At the crux of this tension is the fact that word usage is multifaceted. Words of domination can constrain words of expression. Organizations are sites of subjugation. It only makes sense that language would be part of that dynamic. But there is at least a little symmetry in the asymmetry. Words of domination can be combatted with words of resistance. On the side of domination is the full weight and authority of the organization. Solidarity and freedom reside on the side of resistance. For those engaging in such battles, it makes little sense to argue definitions. Such arguments have the validity of arguing what color socks one’s imaginary friend should be wearing. It is meaningless. If a person in authority asserts the incorrectness of another’s definition and the superiority of one’s own, perhaps the best response is to thank the individual for taking the time to articulate what seems to be an important distinction. There are at least two elements at play here. Under one scenario, the word is actually a “hot button” issue for the individual. It will likely be beneficial to reflect on this. If the word is triggering, it could be useful to know why. Under a different scenario, the person in power is simply doing this to keep another in line. Again, this is useful to know. Such behavior is typically only engaged in when one feels threatened. Either way, the manager who publicly engages in word domination reveals something more than desired. Knowing a manager’s triggers or that a manager is intimidated by a subordinate provides a basis for power and resistance.  #### Related Items [[Words]] [[Power]] [[Management]] [[Argumentation]] [[Reflection]] [[People]]